Author |
Message |
spanners
|
 Re: 1988 G&W D*lly
Okay, so this car's been a bit (?) of a pain in the old 'arris and today proved no different! I decided it was time to turn the car around and finish the passenger side off. So, started it up and realised how badly it was running-bear in mind that it's been plagued with fuel laeks since it's been here. Anyway, checked all the usual suspects, points, new plugs, leads, coil and so on-no better. removed rocker covers and checked valve clearances. I found the tappets were tighter than me! Adjusted valve clearances and retried it, better but still back-firng/missfiring So, question to the really experienced folk out there, anybody else ever come accross such badly adjusted tappets that the valves have kissed the pistons? With a replacement head fitted on the N/S, she started and ran like a dream, so that's a plus I guess! Anyway, onto todays photos.......         
|
September 13th, 2009, 8:53 pm |
|
 |
ken
Agony Aunt - You have a car problem? Speak to Ken
Joined: March 6th, 2009, 1:40 am Posts: 3675
|
 Re: 1988 G&W D*lly
Spanners, wouldn't the perpetrator have had to wind the tappets right in for there to be any chance of that happening? With such a setting, there'd have been very little chance of that cylinder having any compression, so a rather remote chance of the engine starting. Far more probable that it was a straightforward case of over-revving, I'd reckon, especially if the post mortem shows that the exhaust valve stem is bent... ken. spanners wrote: I found the tappets were tighter than me! Adjusted valve clearances and retried it, better but still back-firng/missfiring So, question to the really experienced folk out there, anybody else ever come accross such badly adjusted tappets that the valves have kissed the pistons?
_________________
Last edited by ken on September 14th, 2009, 10:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
September 13th, 2009, 11:04 pm |
|
 |
spanners
|
 Re: 1988 G&W D*lly
ken wrote: Spanners, wouldn't the perpetrator have had to wind the tappets right in for there to be any chance of that happening? With such a setting, there'd have been very little chance of that cylinder having any compression, so a rather remote chance of the engine starting. Far more probable that it was a straighforward case of over-revving, I'd reckon, especially if the post mortem shows that the exhaust valve stem is bent... ken. spanners wrote: I found the tappets were tighter than me! Adjusted valve clearances and retried it, better but still back-firng/missfiring So, question to the really experienced folk out there, anybody else ever come accross such badly adjusted tappets that the valves have kissed the pistons? I was thinking about that last night Ken and concluded very much the same. It was an absolute bitch to start and took some real cranking but, then again, with bent valves it's going to I suppose. Still hate the bloody thing although it starts and runs like a dream now. 
|
September 14th, 2009, 7:43 am |
|
 |
Simon Crook
Firing on two.
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 10:27 pm Posts: 752
|
 Re: 1988 G&W D*lly
Looks good, non-starter bent valves head off - Keep up the good work, its all practice 
_________________
|
September 14th, 2009, 9:23 am |
|
 |
Devils Advocate
Firing on two.
Joined: July 26th, 2009, 3:36 pm Posts: 1019
|
 Re: 1988 G&W D*lly
Hi Spanners.
Fingers crossed your valves aren't actually bent. It might be that by having them too 'tight', with zero clearance, they might 'only' be burnt from not closing fully during the combustion cycle - that'll give you some impressive mis/back-firing too. Possibly a good grinding-in will sort it.
|
September 14th, 2009, 11:33 am |
|
 |
spanners
|
 Re: 1988 G&W D*lly
Today has seen me stuck in the garage for 8 or so hours but well worth it I'd say. Anyway, the rot on this thing didn't stop at the floors and sills etc, it also extended to........ Seat runners, I managed to stab a screwdriver right the way through this one!  Front door bottoms  And rear door hinges  So I got the welder out for the rear doors-I'm not replacing them, it's not my car!   I don't want it rotting away in a hurry so I've filled all the various box sections up with Waxoyl  And lastly, it's starting to look like a car again at last  Hopefully have it finished tomorrow....................... Fingers crossed.
|
September 19th, 2009, 6:42 pm |
|
 |
Simon Crook
Firing on two.
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 10:27 pm Posts: 752
|
 Re: 1988 G&W D*lly
Really looking good, nice work, I'm getting such a bug for having a road going 2cv 
_________________
|
September 20th, 2009, 9:06 am |
|
 |
spanners
|
 Re: 1988 G&W D*lly
Simon Crook wrote: Really looking good, nice work, I'm getting such a bug for having a road going 2cv  A weekend on your racer and it could be road legal! 
|
September 20th, 2009, 9:23 am |
|
 |
Simon Crook
Firing on two.
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 10:27 pm Posts: 752
|
 Re: 1988 G&W D*lly
_________________
|
September 20th, 2009, 9:37 am |
|
 |
spanners
|
 Re: 1988 G&W D*lly
I know what you mean though Simon-I would like a standard road 2CV some times. The racer's great fun but can be a little "bumpy" at times. 
|
September 20th, 2009, 9:42 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|